
In directors disqualification proceedings, the court might at times need expert assistance on issues of fact, but, generally speaking, it was hard to see why a court should need expert evidence that was simply expert opinion when considering the key question of whether a director was unfit to be concerned in the management of a limited company.
A party to a contract that was subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English High Court could not restrain the other party’s foreign trustee in bankruptcy from seeking an order in foreign insolvency proceedings that certain conditions precedent to liability under the contract should cease to apply.
Where the taxpayer companies carried forward in their tax computations the element of depreciation in fixed assets that related to production of unsold stock as part of the cost of unsold stocks they did not infringe the prohibition of deductions for the depreciation of capital assets in s 74(1)(f) of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 (as renumbered by s 144(2) of the Finance Act 1994).
A term of imprisonment for public protection should not be imposed for an offence which was committed over a period of two or more days which straddled the coming into force of the dangerous offender provisions where it was not clear when the offence was actually committed.
Where a jury was considering whether a person was guilty of an offence under s 5 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004 of causing or allowing the death of a child or vulnerable adult by the unlawful act of a person in the same household, when he was or ought to have been aware of a “significant” risk of serious physical harm, the term “significant” bore its ordinary, normal meaning.
Where two or more persons acting together as principals in a drug trafficking offence, as defined by s 1(3) of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994, jointly received payment or reward in connection with that offence, the value of each person’s proceeds of drug trafficking for the purposes of s 4(1)(b) of the 1994 Act included the whole value of that payment or reward.
Evidence of misconduct by a defendant was evidence “to do with” the alleged facts of the offence with which the defendant was charged and therefore excluded from the definition of bad character in s 98(a) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, if it had some nexus in time with that offence.
The offence of kidnapping was not committed where a defendant, by a fraudulent misrepresentation, induced a person to make a journey which did not deprive him of his liberty.
Cases in which a breach of procedural rules would entitle a court to exclude evidence of substantial probative value would be rare and a court should be most reluctant to exclude evidence of that quality for such a breach; none the less there would be cases where the only way in which the court could ensure fairness was by doing so.
The common law privilege against self-incrimination could not be invoked in relation to illegal material found on a computer in the execution of a civil search order.
The Attorney General (Lord Goldsmith QC):
"Today the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) have announced that they have decided, after applying the evidential and public interest tests set out in the Code for Crown Prosecutors, to prosecute Mr Andrey Konstantinovich Lugovoy, a Russian citizen, for the murder of Alexander Valterovich Litvinenko. The CPS decision was reached after they had consulted me, which is the usual practice in serious and complex cases. They have concluded that there is sufficient evidence to prosecute Mr Lugovoy for murder and it is in the public interest to do so.
Action to protect vulnerable workers and root out the rogue employers was outlined by Trade and Industry Secretary Alistair Darling today.
A Vulnerable Worker Enforcement Forum will bring together experts from unions, business, enforcement and advice bodies to look at the best way to protect the vulnerable in the workforce.
An employee’s discussions with his employer about the scope of his entitlement on the employment contract were inadmissible as “without prejudice” communications even though at the time they occurred there was no litigation in prospect and no basis for litigation at the time they took place.
In a consultation starting today the Trade and Industry Secretary Alistair Darling will propose options including fixed penalty fines linked to the number of workers underpaid.
It is also proposed that for the first time businesses would have to pay interest or other cash to workers they have underpaid on top of repaying arrears, so the workforce are no longer giving "interest free loans" to their employers.
In ancillary relief proceedings where the court was carrying out the statutory exercise under s 25 of the 1973 Act, consideration of the “sharing principle” was no longer required to be postponed until the end of the statutory exercise, and sharing had become a principle rather than a “yardstick for use as a check”.
Since no fixed route was followed the monthly mass cycle rides through central London could not be considered commonly or customarily held processions and therefore the organisers were required to give the police prior notice of the names of organisers, date and start time and intended route.
'Safe, Sensible, Social - next steps for the National Alcohol Strategy' unveiled today by Home Office Minister Vernon Coaker and Public Health Minister Caroline Flint builds on the foundations laid and the lessons learnt since 2004, when the country's first Alcohol Harm Reduction Strategy was launched.
Firstly, the new strategy will ensure the laws and licensing powers introduced to tackle alcohol-fuelled crime and disorder, protect young people and tackle irresponsibly managed premises are being used widely and effectively.
The British Indian Ocean Territory (Constitution) Order 2004 and the British Indian Ocean Territory (Immigration) Order 2004 were amenable to judicial review and were an abuse of power in that they frustrated the legitimate expectation of the islanders to be allowed to return to the Chagos Islands.
Aimed at frontline practitioners such as GPs, school nurses, midwives, and A&E staff, the guidelines provide practical advice on how to recognise the warning signs, and what to do if a patient discloses that they have been, or are about to be, forced to marry.
Tackling illegal immigration is a key priority for the Border and Immigration Agency (BIA) and teams operating in London and the South East will be vital in the agency's efforts, BIA's new Regional Director said today.
Tony Smith, recently appointed to lead Border and Immigration Agency operations in the area, was speaking as enforcement officers launched a fresh crack down on bogus employees in Middlesex (see notes for editors).
Right To Marry of Illegal Immigrants UpheldThe statutory scheme requiring permission by the Home Office for marriage by people subject to immigration control or those who had entered the United Kingdom illegally contravened arts 12 and 14 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms which guaranteed the right to marry and the right not to be discriminated against for reasons of nationality or religion.
The court had a discretion to allow the Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks to raise objections on appeal that had not been maintained before a hearing officer determining whether to grant a patent.
The common law privilege against self-incrimination could not be invoked in relation to illegal material found on a computer in the execution of a civil search order.
Where the Commission of the European Communities found that an undertaking had participated in anti-competitive practices contrary to art 81 EC and imposed a fine by reference to the undertaking’s turnover in the “preceding business year”, and the undertaking had no turnover in the business year preceding the date of the infringement decision, the Commission was entitled to refer to another business year.
A party to a contract that was subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English High Court could not restrain the other party’s foreign trustee in bankruptcy from seeking an order in foreign insolvency proceedings that certain conditions precedent to liability under the contract should cease to apply.
Where the determination of a secure tenancy by the granting of a possession order had brought to an end an existing application under the Housing Act 1985 which had established the right to buy at a particular time and a particular price, that application was not capable of being revived once the tenancy itself had been revived.
It was not within the contemplation of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 that the leaseholder of a long lease of a building, which included multiple flats and common parts, came within the expression “a qualifying tenant of a flat” in s 56(1) so as to be able to exercise a statutory right to acquire a new long lease of a flat in the leased building, and the landlord of such a leaseholder was not bound to grant a new long lease.
Where a tenant had filed an acknowledgment of service indicating an intention to take a new lease in response to his landlord’s application to the court to grant a new lease under the amended provisions of s 24(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, subsequent notice to the court that the tenant no longer wanted a new tenancy was similar to filing of a notice to discontinue a claim for a new lease justifying an order that the tenant should pay the costs of the entire proceedings to the landlord.
The principle that judicial findings made in a previous case were not admissible in later proceedings as evidence of facts found only applied where a party in the second proceedings had not had opportunity, by himself or his privy, to challenge evidence adduced in the first hearing.
A licensing authority, in refusing an application for a sex establishment licence, had been entitled to take objections and representations made after the expiry of the prescribed 28-day period into account. Where it had acted fairly and properly exercised its powers its decision was not vitiated by failure to refer specifically to the applicant’s Convention rights.
Consumer Minister, Ian McCartney today published a consultation that will implement the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (UCPD).
The new law will protect consumers by outlawing a host of deceptive and intimidating sales practices that are unfair but not currently illegal. It will also benefit honest businesses, by simplifying consumer protection legislation and clamping down on rogue traders.
Powers of FSA RestrictedThe Financial Services Ombudsman did not have the power to make a direction under s 229(2)(b) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 that would require a respondent to make a money award exceeding the statutory cap provided in the Ombudsman scheme rules.
Notification requirements contained in s 9 of the Pensions Appeals Tribunals Act 1943 relating to rights of appeal from decisions of the Secretary of State for Defence on war pensions claims made pursuant to the Naval, Military and Air Forces etc (Disablement and Death) Service Pensions Order 1983, and to the time limits for such appeals, did not require the provision of a single document but could be fulfilled by the provision of a letter enclosing a leaflet to which reference was made,.nor was it necessary to state the date on which the time limit for the bringing of an appeal expired. Provided the information was reasonably clear, a notice specifying that notice of appeal must be given within a specified period of a specified date sufficed. A failure to comply strictly with the requirements of s 9 did not preclude the relevant time limits for appeals from starting to run.
Where the taxpayer companies carried forward in their tax computations the element of depreciation in fixed assets that related to production of unsold stock as part of the cost of unsold stocks they did not infringe the prohibition of deductions for the depreciation of capital assets in s 74(1)(f) of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 (as renumbered by s 144(2) of the Finance Act 1994).
The procedure for making a claim to the Motor Insurers’ Bureau for compensation in respect of injury caused by an untraced driver under the Untraced Drivers Agreement 1972, which procedure was relied on by the United Kingdom as implementing art 1(4) of Council Directive 84/5/EEC, should be subject to a limitation period no less favourable than that which applied under s 28 of the Limitation Act 1980 to the commencement of proceedings by minors for personal injury in tort against a traced driver. Because the three-year time limit for the bringing of a claim under the Untraced Drivers Agreement 1972 was not compliant with art 1(4) of the Directive, which was capable of having direct effect, the United Kingdom was in sufficiently serious breach of its Community law obligations to give rise in principle to a liability for damages.