In Camera Evidence Speculation Is Contemtuous
In re Times Newspapers Ltd and others [2007] EWCA Crim 1925
CA
Weekly Law Reports Summary
30 July 2007
A judge in a criminal trial had power to prevent publication of a question and answer exchange which took place in open court but which should have taken place in camera. Publication of speculation as to the content of evidence that was given in camera could constitute a contempt of court.