skip navigation
random image random quote

Restrictive Covenants Case Shocks


 
No Need To Change Restrictive Covenant
Lawntown Ltd v Camenzuli and another
[2007] EWCA Civ 949
CA
10 October 2007
Weekly Law Reports Summary

Where the court was exercising its discretion under s 610(2) of the Housing Act 1985 to decide whether to vary a restrictive covenant to permit conversion of a single dwelling house into flats where planning permission had been granted there was no presumption, let alone duty, in favour of varying the covenant. It was left to the court to take account of all relevant factors and to carry out a balancing exercise, giving such weight as it judged appropriate to the various factors in the exercise of its discretion.

Related Articles

   
  Housing Authority To Allow Overcrowding?
  Illegality Leads To Unenforceability
  New York, New York But No Security
  TV Phone In Stopped In Europe
  Arbitrator's Error Not His Fault
  How Early Is A Waste Disposal Licence Necessary?
  Consumers To Be Leaders
  Drug Tests At The Road Side
  Countries Can Impose Compulsory Retirement Ages
  A Trustee Can Be Questioned After He Has Made Prima Facie Case For Exercise of Lien
  Highway Code Unleashed on Cyclists
  Agreement About Maintenance Survives Death
  Papparazzi Win Photo Opportunity
  Holiday Info For Youngsters
  Churches Risk Porn For Phone Masts
  Are LPAs Good For Clients?
  Final LPA Forms and Regs, At Last
  Demonstrator Wins Case?
  Press Rights Extended at Inquests
   
 
 

© UKLawyers. All rights reserved.

Legal Disclaimer
[smaller] Change text size [larger]