skip navigation
random image random quote

Asbestos Claim From 1960's Succeeds


 
Employer's Duty of Care  For Asbestos Labourers

Rice v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry: [2007] EWCA Civ 289

CA
Weekly Law Reports Summary
 4 April 2007
Only recently reported
The board knew or ought to have known that unloading asbestos in hessian sacks carried a serious risk to health, and it was fair, just and reasonable to impose a specific duty of care requiring the board to protect the individual workers against that risk. Although the scope of the duty had not been determined, to do nothing was not an option for the board.

Related Articles

   
  How To Consider A Religious Employment?
  Employeee Loses Out In Liquidation
  Countries Can Impose Compulsory Retirement Ages
  Flights of Fancy For Airport Redundancies?
  Sectioned Employee Disabled?
  Restrictive Covenants and IFAs
  Slippery Floor In Care Home - Both Sides Trip Up
  New Racial Hatred Laws Start
  Corporate Manslaughter Bill Is Passed
  Payment By Results Guide
  School Support Staff Are Winners
  Pregnant Teacher Wins Part of Sex Discrimination Case
  Two More Contrasting Stress Cases Hit The Courts
  88 Seconds Is A Long Time, Too Long
  Work-Induced Nervous Breakdown Was Negligence
  Less Age Discrimination By Employers
  Pension Scheme Winding Up - Gender Issues
  Which Jurisdiction Has Priority In Employment Law?
  Employment Covenants Considered
   
 
 

© UKLawyers. All rights reserved.

Legal Disclaimer
[smaller] Change text size [larger]