skip navigation
random image random quote

Extradition and International Arrest Warrants Compared


 
International Arrest Warrant v Extradition
Caldarelli v Judge for Preliminary Investigations of the Court of Naples, Italy
[2007] EWHC 1624
QBD
Weekly Law Reports Summary
12 July 2007

The amendments to s 2(5)(a) of the Extradition Act 2003 inserted by s 42 and para 1(1), Pt 1 of Sch 13 of the Police and Justice Act 2006 substituting the words “has been convicted” for “is alleged to be unlawfully at large” went only to the content of the European arrest warrant: whereas for the exercise of the power to extradite it remained necessary to show either an “accusation” case or an “unlawfully at large” case.

Related Articles

   
  New York, New York But No Security
  How Early Is A Waste Disposal Licence Necessary?
  Where To Sue Multiple International Defendants
  Border Guards get Fingerprints in Gatwick
  Consumers' International Rights
  Border Guards get Uniforms Nationally
  VAT Fraud and the Innocent
  Border Guards get Uniforms in Gatwick
  Holiday Info For Youngsters
  Asylum Application Dropping
  Service Out Of Jurisdiction Allowed Against Impecunious Defendant
  National Identity Scheme Changes Its Spots
  Fingerprinting Protects Our Borders
  Extradition Powers - What To Base Them On?
  Deportation - Detention Of Rapist Until Carrier Found
  Deportation - Secret Materials And Criminal Acts
  Which Jurisdiction Has Priority In Employment Law?
  Homeless Person Can Be Denied Benefits
  Reusing Oil Is Not Using Waste
   
 
 

© UKLawyers. All rights reserved.

Legal Disclaimer
[smaller] Change text size [larger]