skip navigation
random image random quote

Papparazzi Win Photo Opportunity


 
Child of Famous Person's Right to Privacy
Murray (by his litigation friends, Murray and another) v Express Newspapers plc and another [2007] EWHC 1908 (Ch D)
Ch D

7 August 2007

Weekly Law Reports Summary
Published 2 October 2007

Routine activities conducted in a public place, such as walking down the street or visiting the shops, did not attract any reasonable expectation or guarantee of privacy so that an individual who had been photographed in a public place could not rely on the right to respect for his private and family life under art 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as scheduled to the Human Rights Act 1998, absent some other special circumstance such as harassment or distress.

Related Articles

   
  Scottish Prison Mistake Not Covered By HR Act
  Don't Over-React To Minor Mistakes
  Illegality Leads To Unenforceability
  New York, New York But No Security
  Police Powers Extended Too Far?
  Arbitrator's Error Not His Fault
  House of Lords Allows Bribery Arbitration
  House of Lords Stamps On Police on Juries
  Countries Can Impose Compulsory Retirement Ages
  Defendant Changed Late After Mistake
  Service Out Of Jurisdiction Allowed Against Impecunious Defendant
  Demonstrator Wins Case?
  Decisive Hearsay Not Make Trial Unfair
  Police in NI Allowed Anonymity Because of Death Threats
  In Camera Evidence Speculation Is Contemtuous
  Trade Description Prosecution About Odometers Winds Down
  LLoyds Is Not As Public As You Might Think
  Dam Bursts On Netherlands Libel Action
  Government's Duty To Investigate Death of Person In Its Care
   
 
 

© UKLawyers. All rights reserved.

Legal Disclaimer
[smaller] Change text size [larger]