skip navigation
random image random quote

EU Courts - Where to Sue?

Jurisdiction of EU Courts Over Actions in EU States
Bols Distilleries BV and another v Superior Yacht Services Ltd
[2006] UKPC 45
PC
11 Oct 2006
Daily Law Notes Summary
For the court of one EC member state to accept jurisdiction in a
claim brought against a defendant domiciled in another member
state, on the basis that there was a “good arguable case” that
such jurisdiction had been conferred by an agreement in writing
or evidenced in writing within the meaning of art 23(1)(a) of
Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001, the claimant had to show that on
the material available he had a much better argument than the
defendant that it could be established clearly and precisely that
the clause conferring jurisdiction was the subject of consensus
between the parties.

Related Articles

   
  Scottish Prison Mistake Not Covered By HR Act
  Don't Over-React To Minor Mistakes
  Illegality Leads To Unenforceability
  New York, New York But No Security
  Police Powers Extended Too Far?
  Arbitrator's Error Not His Fault
  House of Lords Allows Bribery Arbitration
  House of Lords Stamps On Police on Juries
  Countries Can Impose Compulsory Retirement Ages
  Defendant Changed Late After Mistake
  Papparazzi Win Photo Opportunity
  Service Out Of Jurisdiction Allowed Against Impecunious Defendant
  Demonstrator Wins Case?
  Decisive Hearsay Not Make Trial Unfair
  Police in NI Allowed Anonymity Because of Death Threats
  In Camera Evidence Speculation Is Contemtuous
  Trade Description Prosecution About Odometers Winds Down
  LLoyds Is Not As Public As You Might Think
  Dam Bursts On Netherlands Libel Action
  Government's Duty To Investigate Death of Person In Its Care
   
 
 

© UKLawyers. All rights reserved.

Legal Disclaimer
[smaller] Change text size [larger]