skip navigation
random image random quote

Mistakes in Naming Defendant Rectifiable Late

Substituting Defendant After Mistake
O’Byrne v Aventis Pasteur MSD Ltd [2006] EWHC 2562 (QB)
QBD
20 October 2006
Daily Law Notes Summary
Where a new party was to be substituted for a party whose name
had been given in a claim in the original action in mistake for
the new party’s name then substitution was to be regarded as
necessary for the determination of the original action.

Related Articles

   
  Highway Code Unleashed on Cyclists
  House of Lords Kills Asbestosis Case
  Defendant Changed Late After Mistake
  Slippery Floor In Care Home - Both Sides Trip Up
  Corporate Manslaughter Bill Is Passed
  PI Claims - Marketeers Or Claims Managers?
  Payment By Results Guide
  Asbestos Claim From 1960's Succeeds
  Work-Induced Nervous Breakdown Was Negligence
  Hate Crime Victims Get Help
  EU Denounces Government Safety Laws
  Soldiers To Comply With HR Act Abroad
  MIB Limitation Period Too Short
  More Compensation For The Injured?
  Better Ways To Get Compensation?
  Claims Management Firms Regulated At Last
  Employer Liable For Driver's Tiredness
  Asbestosis Sufferers Get Protection If Dock Workers
  Solicitors Beware Of Claims Management - Publicity Rules Affected
  Solicitors Ordered To Pay Appellant's Costs
   
 
 

© UKLawyers. All rights reserved.

Legal Disclaimer
[smaller] Change text size [larger]