skip navigation
random image random quote

Defendant Changed Late After Mistake


 
Substitution of Defendant Outside Limitation Period
O’Byrne v Aventis Pasteur MSD Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 939
CA
 9 October 2007
Weekly Law Notes Summary

A party could be substituted under s 35 of the Limitation Act 1980 where the ten-year limitation period for making a claim for damages caused by a defective product had expired, even where the correct party was known to the claimant before the limitation period expired, if the claimant had made a mistake about the name of the defendant and substitution was necessary for the purpose of determining the original action.

Related Articles

   
  Scottish Prison Mistake Not Covered By HR Act
  Don't Over-React To Minor Mistakes
  Illegality Leads To Unenforceability
  New York, New York But No Security
  Police Powers Extended Too Far?
  Arbitrator's Error Not His Fault
  House of Lords Allows Bribery Arbitration
  House of Lords Stamps On Police on Juries
  Countries Can Impose Compulsory Retirement Ages
  Papparazzi Win Photo Opportunity
  Service Out Of Jurisdiction Allowed Against Impecunious Defendant
  Demonstrator Wins Case?
  Decisive Hearsay Not Make Trial Unfair
  Police in NI Allowed Anonymity Because of Death Threats
  In Camera Evidence Speculation Is Contemtuous
  Trade Description Prosecution About Odometers Winds Down
  LLoyds Is Not As Public As You Might Think
  Dam Bursts On Netherlands Libel Action
  Government's Duty To Investigate Death of Person In Its Care
   
 
 

© UKLawyers. All rights reserved.

Legal Disclaimer
[smaller] Change text size [larger]