skip navigation
random image random quote

House of Lords on Defamation of Company


 
Defamation of Company In Clear Public Interest Cases
Jameel and another v Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl
[2006] UKHL 44
11 October 2006
Daily Law Notes Summary
Publishers of an article of clear public interest were not to be
denied the protection of qualified privilege on the narrow ground
that, despite having taken reasonable steps to verify its
contents, they failed to delay publication to enable the claimants
to respond.  The common law rule entitling a trading company in
defamation proceedings to rely on the presumption of damage
without proving special damage was not abrogated by art 10 of the
European Convention on Human Rights and required no revision.

Related Articles

   
  Scottish Prison Mistake Not Covered By HR Act
  Don't Over-React To Minor Mistakes
  Illegality Leads To Unenforceability
  New York, New York But No Security
  Police Powers Extended Too Far?
  Arbitrator's Error Not His Fault
  House of Lords Allows Bribery Arbitration
  House of Lords Stamps On Police on Juries
  Countries Can Impose Compulsory Retirement Ages
  Defendant Changed Late After Mistake
  Papparazzi Win Photo Opportunity
  Service Out Of Jurisdiction Allowed Against Impecunious Defendant
  Demonstrator Wins Case?
  Decisive Hearsay Not Make Trial Unfair
  Police in NI Allowed Anonymity Because of Death Threats
  In Camera Evidence Speculation Is Contemtuous
  Trade Description Prosecution About Odometers Winds Down
  LLoyds Is Not As Public As You Might Think
  Dam Bursts On Netherlands Libel Action
  Government's Duty To Investigate Death of Person In Its Care
   
 
 

© UKLawyers. All rights reserved.

Legal Disclaimer
[smaller] Change text size [larger]