skip navigation
random image random quote

Relief In Small Company Tax case


 
Arctic Systems Case Gets To House of Lords
Jones v Garnett (HM Inspector of Taxes) [2007] UKHL 35
HL(E)
Weekly Law Reports Summary
25 July 2007

A husband who provided his services to the market via a private company which his wife co-owned, thus distributing his earned income between them both via dividend, was not liable to tax on the income transferred to the wife, pursuant to section 660A of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988, provided the wife’s shares in the company were ordinary shares which carried a right to more than just income. 

But watch out if it is not a married couple - the marriage was the key to this success.

Related Articles

   
  Family Court Decision Determinative?
  Agreement About Maintenance Survives Death
  Are LPAs Good For Clients?
  Final LPA Forms and Regs, At Last
  Press Rights Extended at Inquests
  Adoption Procedure - Leave to Oppose Considered
  Domestic Violence in the Employment Context
  Forced Marriage Guidance
  No Need To Ask Government For Marriage Permission
  48 million is OK
  Parents Have No Rights in Care Cases?
  Alarming Bankruptcy Case Upsets Divorce Lawyers
  Public Guardianship Fees Announced
  Public Guardianship Fees and Mental Capacity Update
  Childhood Defence Stays But Presumption Goes
  DV Victim And Immigration Rules
  Millions of Cohabitees Affected
  Better Education For Kids in Care
  Care Proceedings Changes In The Wind
   
 
 

© UKLawyers. All rights reserved.

Legal Disclaimer
[smaller] Change text size [larger]