skip navigation
random image random quote

Alarming Bankruptcy Case Upsets Divorce Lawyers


 
Subsequent Bankruptcy Defeats Ancillary Relief Orders
Hill and another v Haines [2007] EWHC 1012 (Ch)
Ch D
Weekly Law Notes Summary
3 May 2007

Since an applicant for ancillary relief under ss 23 to 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 did not give consideration in “money or money’s worth” within the meaning of s 339(3)(c) of the Insolvency Act 1986 for relief obtained, any transfer of property made by a bankrupt ex-spouse pursuant to either a court order made in the ancillary proceedings, or a settlement agreement, was a transaction at an undervalue and would be set aside on application by the trustees in bankruptcy.

Related Articles

   
  Illegality Leads To Unenforceability
  TV Phone In Stopped In Europe
  Consumers To Be Leaders
  A Trustee Can Be Questioned After He Has Made Prima Facie Case For Exercise of Lien
  Agreement About Maintenance Survives Death
  Consumers' International Rights
  VAT and the Nectar Trader
  VAT Fraud and the Innocent
  Winter Fuel Payment Reminder
  Are LPAs Good For Clients?
  Final LPA Forms and Regs, At Last
  Relief In Small Company Tax case
  Pension Scheme Winding Up - Gender Issues
  Banks Feel Government Wrath At Last?
  Consumer Credit Agreements And Public Photocopiers Considered
  Compound Interest Is Only Justice, Says HL
  Homeless Person Can Be Denied Benefits
  Business Advice Rationalised
  Internet Shopping Encouraged
  Employers Forced To Give Pensions?
   
 
 

© UKLawyers. All rights reserved.

Legal Disclaimer
[smaller] Change text size [larger]